Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The International Electronic Dance music Hall of Fame
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Concerns about notability and sourcing lead to a consensus to delete. Xymmax So let it be written So let it be done 16:30, 21 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The International Electronic Dance music Hall of Fame (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
unclear notability Melaen (talk) 20:09, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete does not appear to passWP:ORG, also seems to be some sort of cut-and-paste. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:22, 14 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep Clear notability This Organization is a registered Non-profit 501 (c) (3) with the state of California, has Federal Trademark with United states Libery of Congress, and has two business Office Address that are full obtainable.
Furthermore the Intent of the organization is clearly stated to follow the Guidelines that reveal the Organization as:
1.A structured company with purpose toward the related Music environment.
2.A Chartable organization with clearly stated agenda towards the funding programs that it provides.
3.In the State of California, a non profit must have no less than three named original Board of Directors in order to be register with the Secretary of the State, also they must have Clearly stated agenda that is to the charities purpose, this is available as public record by the State of California, registered July 06,2009 User:william H 1:34, 16 September 2010 (UTC)- Hi William, Wikipedia doesn't actually care about any of that (even though they are obviously important in the real world). What matters is how many independent, third-party, unrelated publications have written something about the organization. Very new organizations often don't qualify for an article on Wikipedia. See WP:NOBBLE and WP:ORG for more information. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:50, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- SPEEDY DELETE as copyvio of THIS and probably something else also... Carrite (talk) 03:25, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:47, 15 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - if the subject is notable it can be recreated as a proper referenced article. . . Mean as custard (talk) 08:29, 20 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.